Murder defendants cannot refuse exam by prosecution-picked
expert if they plan to use the issue in any aspect of their defense or
sentencing.
The Associated Press
July 1, 2004 - PHOENIX - Murder defendants cannot refuse a psychiatric exam
requested by the prosecution if they intend to raise mental health as a
death-penalty sentencing issue, Arizona's top court ruled yesterday.
The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling came in the case of Kenneth Phillips,
charged with first-degree murder and sexual assault in a 1991 stabbing death for
which the wrong man was sent to death row for years.
Awaiting trial in Maricopa County Superior Court, Phillips disclosed he
intended to call an addictionologist and a neuropsychologist to testify during
the penalty phase if convicted.
Prosecutors then asked the trial judge to require Phillips to undergo a
mental health examination by a prosecution-selected expert.
The judge agreed, but Phillips refused to submit to the examination, citing
his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. His refusal prompted the
judge to bar Phillips from presenting testimony from his two mental-health
experts.
The Supreme Court said both sides in criminal trials have a right to rebut
evidence put on by the other and that the state was entitled to have its own
expert examine Phillips.
Phillips asked that the results of the prosecution-sponsored examination be
sealed during the guilt phase, but the justices said that would deprive both
sides of time needed to evaluate those results.
Judges also can refuse to allow defendants to introduce mental-health
evidence if the defendants balk at being examined by prosecution experts, the
Supreme Court said.
However, the fruits of an examination conducted for the penalty phase cannot
be used in the guilt phase, the Supreme Court said, leaving it up to trial
judges to decide how to do that.
The Supreme Court had ruled in 1993 that the prosecution has the right to an
examination by its own expert in guilt phases of trials, but yesterday's ruling
extended that right to the penalty phase that follows if a defendant is
convicted.
Ray Krone was tried twice for 36-year-old bartender Kim Ancona's Dec. 29,
1991, death at a Phoenix tavern. Krone was sentenced to death in 1992, but his
conviction was overturned. He was retried and sentenced to life in prison in
1996.
It wasn't until 2001, when Krone's attorney petitioned the court to have
physical evidence analyzed using new DNA technology, that results indicated DNA
on Ancona's clothes didn't match Krone.
The DNA results implicated Phillips, who was imprisoned for an unrelated sex
crime. Krone was exonerated in April 2002.
The case is Phillips vs. Araneta and State, CV-03-0351.
On the Net: Arizona Supreme Court:
www.supreme.state.az.us.
Return To Latest News