ARIZONA INMATE PROGRAM EVALUATION
Summary of Findings
February 2005
54,660 Arizona inmates released over the period 1990-1999 were
followed for return to ADC custody.
16.2% returned to custody with a new felony conviction within 2
years of release.
24.5% returned to custody with a new felony conviction within 3
years of release.
Inmates who participated in work and other rehabilitation
programs during the period of incarceration were identified and
recidivism rates were compared between those who participated and
those who did not.
For program participants, reductions in recidivism were observed
only during the first two years after release.
The 2-year recidivism rate for program participants was lower
(15.8%) than for non-participants (16.8%).
However, participants were observed to be 13% higher in their
risk of recidivism than non-participants based on their ages,
criminal histories, drug use histories, etc., so the risk of
recidivism was controlled for in making comparisons of recidivism
rates between participants and non-participants.
The 2-year recidivism rate for participants was reduced from
21.1% to 15.8% or by 25.0% due to participation.
2,171 fewer inmates were recommitted within 2 years due to their
program participation.
The recidivism rate reduction was highest (34.0%) for those who
participated in prison industry (ACI) work programs, including,
among others, furniture manufacture (53.4% reduction) and sign
manufacture (55.6% reduction).
Lesser but still substantial reductions in recidivism occurred
for substance abuse programs (28.0%), non-industry in-prison work
programs (27.9%), vocational education (27.7%), and academic
education (17.2%).
A higher level of inmate program involvement correlates with a
greater reduction in recidivism. High program involvement will
reduce recidivism by 35% or more.
The effectiveness of academic education increases with the level
of education attained, i.e., college and other post secondary
education is more effective (31.0% reduction) than GED programming
(19.1% reduction), which, in turn, is more effective than adult
basic education/mandatory literacy (12.4% reduction). Those who
followed through and obtained a GED while in prison had a greater
reduction in recidivism (23.6%) than those who did not complete the
program (17.4% reduction).
For the treatment of drug abuse, alcohol and narcotics anonymous
(47.1% reduction) and therapeutic community programming (27.3%
reduction) were more effective than substance abuse education (21.9%
reduction).
Rehabilitation program effectiveness is hampered by a lack of
time in prison, i.e., under one year served.
Successful completion of the Sex Offender Treatment Program (SOTP)
was found to dramatically reduce recidivism among sex offenders.